That’s because the chipset is not only backward compatible with the older gen motherboards, but you can also pair it up with DDR4 memory. Overall, you can build a reasonably decent budget build with an i5-13600K. Helpful Read: Best Motherboard For i9-13900k i7-13900K comparison there are no doubts that the mid-range chipset also packs a punch. The i5-13600K sits below the i7-13700K and the i9-13900K, and seeing how well the other two chipsets performed in the i9-13900K vs. But before diving deep into the motherboard selections, let’s first go over the Core i5-13600K.Īt the moment, you can get an i5-13600K for about $300, and for that money, you will get 6 Performance (P) cores, and 8 Efficiency (E) cores running at a boost clock speed of 5.10 GHz. I run a small dev site on a spare laptop (W7, IIS) with dual core 2GHZ and 3GB RAM and to be honest it just works.Since the i5-13600K can be paired with an older gen 600-series motherboard, consumers have many options. Do you need to spend £1000+ on a server which a £300 netbook will do just fine? SO is the power, but if you are using a laptop you could use the battery for that if the power drops off (although you'd loose your connection to the net as your router would die) As mentioned above a single HD is a point of failure. A laptop would also have a built-in UPS of 1+hours (but more of that later)
#INTEL DESKTOP BOARD I5 PC#
If you get a notebook or light PC it would probably have an Intel Atom in it which tends to draw a lot less power than an i3/5/7 and would be a bit more economical to run. This is why you pay for RAID cards and setyps in a high-end server. But there is no fail-over, if the disk dies then it's gone. Ok, so you'll get about 160-320GB storage.
#INTEL DESKTOP BOARD I5 WINDOWS 7#
Be it IIS on windows 7 or a LAMP install, I would say 1GB is minumum RAM will amount to at least 1GB nowadays.If you were going to run the next facespace then yes multi or quad cores would be the way to go - but you're not.
You'll need a single or dual core processor, probably 2GHZ to keep things running OK. Granted, they are a far shout from £1000 servers but ultimately you don't really need one. If you are running a small web server at home for a simple forum or dev site you could use a small computer or netbook. don't mess with display cards in such servers.Motherboard life is dependent on CPU power use, the more CPU power use the faster your motherboard dies.CPU usually can live for >5yr, same for RAM.the weakest component in an amateur built server is usually the power supply.the weakest component in a well-equipped server is usually the hard disk.almost all processors nowadays can run 24x7 for very long, longer than your motherboard and power supplies.Motherboard ethernet adapters can and will fail with heavy loads.Low quality power supply = magic smoke coming out.I for one do not respect most motherboard implementation of RAIDs and their failure mode, well, i can only say "creative".You want disk access to be as low as possible for all servers. More RAM means that things are better cached among other things.Remember, your site isn't going to get millions of IOPS, and you are not going to set up a RDBMS with millions of transactions per hour.Get high quality, over-specified power supplies.To get a relatively nice server: (and in short,) It wont be used for personal reasons by anyone.īasically what I want to know is, when running a single resource consuming app 24x7 from a home, all else being equal, will intel server board/proc components outlive/outlast intel desktop board/proc components? Once up and running, it will only be a web server. It wont be used for my personal use like watching movies in the middle etc. will I get problems with Desktop hardware?Īlso, this is going to be dedicated to web service.
I am talking about the effects of running 24x7 vs a few hours a day, the difference btw Movies/Games/Office and one constantly on web server, etc. Things like power failure, net speed (or earthquakes :P) etc will affect both. What might be the issues with using components made for desktop, in a server? By this I mean the issues that I will ONLY get using Desktop hardware, but NOT on proper server hardware. so 1 more reason for me to be confused :S) Or should I buy intel server boards and xeon processors? (they seem to be more expensive compared to desktop components, but also more memory support, two sockets etc. Is it okay to use processors like core i3 or i5 and intel desktop board to run an always-on home web server?
0 kommentar(er)
